Newspaper Archive of
The Perkins Journal
Perkins, Oklahoma
September 11, 1975     The Perkins Journal
PAGE 2     (2 of 10 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Full Size Image
PAGE 2     (2 of 10 available)        PREVIOUS     NEXT      Full Size Image
September 11, 1975

Newspaper Archive of The Perkins Journal produced by SmallTownPapers, Inc.
Website © 2023. All content copyrighted. Copyright Information.     Terms Of Use.     Request Content Removal.

"! 1he .lournal, Thursday, September 11, 1975 Ser~ b GRAY MATTER and MARTHA WELLS, HARLAND WELLS Co-Pubis,her and Editors MONKEY BUSINESS by Lee Gray allowed to do without one. members and let (Think of the rich, beautiful decide whether widow we'd leave!) is going to cause . ";:' l,ec Gra~ Managm Editor ~:- ...FinalOlnmrvation... hikes. .,7--7~- We've been amused with *~' Jane t lint, C~,~p,,~ifi~,n Super, i~,r / "~ "------->" .r---~_ ~ George Meany's playing God ---CatOe ." ---_ ~ --~ lately where the subject has Anaplasmosis h~ Shirle?Hagar. C,m,p,,,,hionTypesetler I T]~O~,~ % c'-'~- W -~ " .A---- been longshoremen loading the lives of se ;rsl """ Rhonda Nickels, Secretary,Receptionist ~j ~ ~...~ .~ ~ ~_~. ~.=_ export wheat, cattle in the Perl ast Frankly wi~ wonder who last two weeks. p~ ~hql -,,~#"~ ~ "-~"" ~" ordained the AFL-ClO's head There has beea 20 .... to hand down ultimatums on cases of the disease~ ~/ ~t ~-~ whether wheat should be understand causes =i IltE JOURNAL , "~-- exported, cells in cattle to P,,blid,~'dc,ervrhursdavbvthePerkin, Publishing l~w~~ ~'~ UIiions. and the power they red blood cells. ~" (,,mpa,~ 133 "S~ Main -Post Office Box L, Perkin~. ~" give to the working man, are Horseflies are ()kh~hm/"405q'Teleljhne377"359qr547-2411' ? ~%/t ~titlwater. Dwight Lloyd Eidsen, incom- DBA Casual Approach, money weather conditkms interstate and intrastate gas is in short supply and "'Finally," he said, "Okla- fiscal David J. Anderson, 30, patibility, judgment, become cold enough that ourpipeline companies to sell gas experiences an increasingly homa Natural also owns and ~,~ Oklahom~ City; lva JoAnn Eddie J. Greer vs, LeimomiCharles A. Braden and customer demand exceeds to any other pipelines, high demand--the price rises, operatesfive underground Ingram ,,,~Beauchamp, 29. Carney. K. Greer, incompatibility.Frances Braden vs.Harold deliverability capacity, any Intrastate pipeline companies Since it is costing producers storages and an extensive of ONG's new "~ (hurler Michael Kelly, 25,Eleanor Ann Devote vs. Lewis and Bobby Lewis, cutbacks innatural gas are not under jurisdiction of more to explore and develop pipeline system throughout is designed ~! View; Ellen Luiclle David Russell Devore, incom- money judgmert, deliveries likely be the Federal Power Commis- deeper and more expensive-to- the state, natural gas Mountain would Sharp, 20, Perkins, patibility. Dewey F, Weaver and Clara confined to a few industrial sion. drill formations, the gas that is Gilbert ConneR Laffoon, 56,Anita Dean Ellis vs. Hubert B. Weaver vs. James R. Avery customers who already have The legislation that will be purchased is costing more "The five undergroqnd Oklahoma's :~ Cushing; Imogene Hopkins, AlexanderEllis, incompati- and Marlene J. Avery, Gary P. standby fuels, and then only recommended to the President proportionally, storages--which are depleted basin ~ 53, Cushing, bility. Worthington and Jocolyn Kay for brief periods of time," said proposes also to allow the "In order to maintain the ~ natural gas fields--enable the estimated 30 % :,:.~ Frank Randall Clark, 19, Worthington,. money judg- C.C. Ingrain, chairman of the Federal Power Commission to economic incentive for produc- company during the summm of natural g~ = Gtencoc; Carrie Lynn Jones, ment. board and chief executive impose a moratorium on allerR to continue to explore and months to store natural gas t 7, Gtencoe. Civil Cases FH~I R.B. Shedrick and Frank officer of ONG. new gas connections, and develop such formations, they until needed during the ~ James Warren Kjormoe, 21. Nelma J. Amey vs Board of Sue Shedtick vs. Cur.hind J. Because of expected severe allow unregulated direct well- must be able to make a fair winter. These storages provide our pipeline Cushh~g; Chyrel Lucile Cook- County Commissioners, et al Silver, money judgment, shortages of natural gas inhead purchase of gas by and reasonable profit on their much needed deliverability io said, "ONG !~ sey. 20, Cushing. Quiet Title. Bray Employees Federal some nonproducing states, endusers using interstate gas investment, As a re~.ult of a the pipeline system during ion to ~ James Claude Blackwell, 20,Griffins Air Force Base Credit Union vs.. Gene D. Ingrain stated that any plan to pipelines as common carriers, free market condition in severely cold days during the ;. El Ren0; Kathleen Ann Credit Union vs. Harold T.Miner, money judgment, allocate natural gas reserves Ingrain emphasized, "The intrastate markets, intrastate :=: DeW,at, 22, Glencoe. Jones and Maureen T. Jones, Kermit W. Ingham Lumber from Oklahoma Natural Gas proposed bill does nothing to gas companies such as ONG ~* Robert Eugene Pierson, money judgment. Co. vs. Sidney Marshall Company's system to inter- develbp new gas supplies and are experiencing less difficulty Hey! Check Legal, Cushing; Laura Lou Stillwater Publishing Co. vs. Malone DBA Marshall Con- state lines would "not be just would be very detrimental to meeting the needs of their Moore, Legal, Cushing: Cortland J. Silver DBA struction Co., money judg- or practical." the much needed deregulation customers than are interstate great buys Jn Richard Lee Cotter, 22, Shedrick's Jewelry, money ment. He explained, "In ONG's of new interstate gas sales companies that are resulated :< week's .= Cushing; Gall Denise Drake, judgment. Terry Lee Powers vs. Ronald case, virtually all our custom, effort now before the Senate. as to the price they can p~y'for 18, Cushing. Aetna Finance Co. vs. Kersh and Arthur Catlett, err are in the high-priority This detrimental proposal by new natural gas at the .... Jan Rodney Burton, 21, Darena Butler, money judg-money judgment, range established by the the Federal Energy Admini- wellhead. . g~ Oklahoma City; Carol Annette ment. ProlmtesFlled Federal Power Commission. strut,on--without consultation "Unfortunately, the at- "l t CITIZI=N'S +:':, Frederick, 21, Oklahoma City. Aetna Finance Co. vs. MikeP-75-136 J.D. of LaVeta G.Although a case might be with . any knowledgeable tempts on the part of Congress ~ HELPFUL IDEAS FOR SUCCESSFUL ~ Anthony Lebo Goyang, 24, T, Wilson and Bonnie Wilson, Loan. made for allocating natural gas people in the nation's natural in requiting the Federal Power . ~tillwater; Linda Dale Nicen, money judgment. P-75-137 J.D. of Death of from such low-priority natural gas industry--must be Commission--which itself has 22, Stillwater, Aetna Finance Co. vs. EarlOllie Nash. gas users as electric $onemt. stopped." recommended deregulation-- Home Health when it is Divorces Filed G. Wells and Ruth C. Wells, P-75-138 Letter of Adm. ofing plants that use natural gas to keep prices low, have If you are confined to your If you live m Glet~da Jean Briscoe vs. money judgment. Nona Myrtle Bently. as a bullet-.fuel for use by created a condition where home and you need part.time eldfrly or a Orlando LeRoy Briscoe, in-Aetna Finance Co. vs. P-75-139 Will of George T.higher-priorit#'customers such According to lngram, Okla- interstate pipeline companies skilled nursing care or physical factilitv, this compatibility, James R. Avery, replevin and Jessee. as residential homes--it would homa Natural Gas Company's simply cannot be competitive o'r speech therapy Medicare may your I~ome Irene Fern Tull vs. Glenn money judgment. P-75-140 J.D. of Death of not be just to allocate natural current position of being able for new natural gas reserves help pay for these and other spry- payment A Dale Tull; incompatibility. University Bank vs. ThomasJames R. Fleming. gas away from high-priorityto meet the needs of its that are being produced. But ices furnished m >'our home by a other place lrmadine F. Casey vs. J. Drone and Bobble L. Drone; P.75-141 Will of Donna J. Oklahoma customers to give it customers is due to three without the economic incentive home health agency taking part skilled Clarence D. Casey, incompati, money judgment. Roberts. to equally high.priority CUR. important factors. "First is our of the free market createdin Medicare. patients c .: bilitv. University Bank vs. Deral R, P-75.142 J.D. of Eulah Lois tomers elsewhereI" ability to purchase new natural within the intrastate markets, Your doctor has to order this your home " kind of care for you and. from For more gas reserves at fair and there would be little or no Malladi Narasimha Sidd- Nelson, money judgment. Phillips aka Lois E. Phillips. "Furthermore," he con- reasonable market prices, due time to time review the plan he Medicare home ii hanty vs. MaUadi Suryakuma-Oklahoma Morris Plan vs. P-75-143 Gdn. of Christo- tinued, "such a plan would not economic incentive on the part .... has set up ask someone =~ of producers to develop new Medicare can pay for home security ri, incompatibility. Jesse Richardson and Betty J. pher Corsten Stone and Sally be practical or f~asible, to the fact that we are an ! Tommy J~e 'thomasson Richardson and Lymon Anne Stone. because at the very time when intrastate natural gas company fields and no new would be VS. gas health care under either hospital can also P Barbara Janell Thomasson,Richardson, money judgment, P.75.144 Det. of Death of areas experiencing such short, and therefore free from coming to market at all,"insurance, Part A ~ or medical in- about home ~: incompatibility. Ahrberg Millin~ of Cushing Charles C.Sanders. ages would need the gas the unrealistic Federal Power Ingrain said. surance ~Part B~ Medicare can ices available ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: most, it would also be the Commission price regulations. He continued, "The second cover home health care only reunify j~. .......... , , , , , ,, ,,n.. ,